Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Custom Draft Guide Question
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by JonE View PostHis stats are similar so his R$ is similar.
Player A is 80 / 28 / 87 / 3 / 259
Player B is 62 / 18 / 72 / 4 / 272
Both are 3Bs yet Player A is valued at $11 while Player B is $4!
I can see that Player A is forecasting better results in more categories, yet I don't quite understand why he is almost three times the total value.
Incidentally, for those of us who like that sort of thing, Player A's MM rating is 60, Player B's is 70.
Am I missing something fairly obvious?
Comment
-
I don't think those are as "similar" as you think. 30% more R, 56% more HR, 21% more RBI -- that's a lot of additional value.
I also wonder how many ABs the players have. Player B's higher average is worth less if you get fewer ABs from him. The value of BA is pretty high in the HQ formula and it's easy to overlook, even for longtime readers such as you and me.
Comment
-
Adding to JonE's response, realize that the dollar allocation doesn't exactly claim that Player A's projection is roughly three times as valuable as Player B's projection is. Instead, the dollar allocation is saying that the distance between Player A's projection minus the replacement level is roughly three times as great as the distance between Player B's projection minus the replacement level."If you torture data long enough, they will confess." -- Ronald Coase
Comment
-
Originally posted by Michael@HQ View PostAdding to JonE's response, realize that the dollar allocation doesn't exactly claim that Player A's projection is roughly three times as valuable as Player B's projection is. Instead, the dollar allocation is saying that the distance between Player A's projection minus the replacement level is roughly three times as great as the distance between Player B's projection minus the replacement level.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JonE View PostI don't think those are as "similar" as you think. 30% more R, 56% more HR, 21% more RBI -- that's a lot of additional value.
I also wonder how many ABs the players have. Player B's higher average is worth less if you get fewer ABs from him. The value of BA is pretty high in the HQ formula and it's easy to overlook, even for longtime readers such as you and me.
Both are projected at over 500 ABs although one, as you might have guessed, is just at that age where decline starts to set in.
I'm comparing Kyle Seager with Evan Longoria, and the surprise was confirmed when I checked their $ values over the previous two years. 2016 CDG gave me Seager at $14, Longoria at $10, for 2017 the split was $16 and $10, and now while Seager has stayed in double-digits, Longoria has plummeted to $4.
Can AT&T Park have that much effect on his output? Maybe it will!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Penfold View PostThanks JonE. I see your point although I would add that if I hit 1 HR and you hit 2 HRs then you would be offering 100% more HRs than me; which shows that while percentage differences are informative, they only paint part of the picture.
IOW: Michael put it much better.
Comment
-
Comment