I have entered in my league info and I am getting some wierd rankings for hitters. Categories are HR, RBI, R, SO, OPS, SB, AVG, 10 Teams AL and NL, 3 OF 1,2,3,SS, util, 9 pitchers. some examples for hitters it has Jeff Keppinger at $41 and Matt Kemp at -$2. what am I doing wrong?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Custom draft guide confusion.
Collapse
X
-
I'm not a tech guy but it probably has to do with Strikeouts. Those should be weighted negatively, I think. Just for kicks, take out K's, run the other categories, and see what you get.Let every child available for adoption become eligible for adoption..
-
Originally posted by tavo2311 View PostYeah strikeouts for batters make the CDG do very weird things. A tip Ray gave me was to change the weighting of them from the default 1 to .33 or .5 and you will get much more realistic results. Play around and see what it looks like.
Comment
-
I ran the Custom Draft Guide and it showed Prince Fielder at $13. The parameters I set up were BA, HR, RBI, R, SB and BB. His projections are similar to Cabrera and Pujols who are at $39 and $30 respectfully. Why such a low value for Fielder?AL only keeper league, 10 teams. $270 cap. Positions - 5 OF, 1B, 3B, CO, 2B, SS, MI, 2 C, 1 DH, 10 pitchers, 4 reserves and 5 minor leaguers. Categories: BA, HR, RBI, SB, (Runs + BB), Errors for hitting, W, ERA, SV and (IP+K)-(H+BB) for pitching.
Comment
-
Yes I do. That explains it. I haven't entered the teams that have Pujols and Cabrera yet. This is my first time using this tool with the keeper option.
Thank youAL only keeper league, 10 teams. $270 cap. Positions - 5 OF, 1B, 3B, CO, 2B, SS, MI, 2 C, 1 DH, 10 pitchers, 4 reserves and 5 minor leaguers. Categories: BA, HR, RBI, SB, (Runs + BB), Errors for hitting, W, ERA, SV and (IP+K)-(H+BB) for pitching.
Comment
-
I asked this before but it just seems like the CDG is using ROS + current stats to get dollar values. My CDG has Chris Davis and Dom Brown as 2 of the top 5 OF. They have been producing top 5 numbers and may keep producing that way but it just seems like its using current stats + ROS.
Comment
-
No, that's not what it does. But at this point in the season with so many ABs in the books for these guys, when weighing YTD performance with pre-2013 history to develop a balance-of-year projection, the sample size for 2013 gets a lot more weight than it would have in, say, May.
Comment
Comment