Running my leagues through both dollar valuators, I've noticed that Baseball HQ $ values are higher for a large number of players, compared to Baseball Prospectus'. The differences are somewhat lower when forcing positions in CDG, but still, a large percentage of players come out with higher dollar values.
I understand that the projection systems differ, but shouldn't, on the whole, everything even out?
In particular, the BP values seem to greatly undervalue starting pitchers compared to HQ, with BP valuing saves and steals more.
Any insight? A difference in playing time estimates? A difference in just how much certain stats are valued in the standings?
I tend to trust HQs projections more than BP's Pecota, but it doesn't make sense to me that around 3/4 (off the top of my head) HQ $ values are higher than BP's. Am I missing something obvious in my inputs, or math-wise?
Thanks,
Foster
I understand that the projection systems differ, but shouldn't, on the whole, everything even out?
In particular, the BP values seem to greatly undervalue starting pitchers compared to HQ, with BP valuing saves and steals more.
Any insight? A difference in playing time estimates? A difference in just how much certain stats are valued in the standings?
I tend to trust HQs projections more than BP's Pecota, but it doesn't make sense to me that around 3/4 (off the top of my head) HQ $ values are higher than BP's. Am I missing something obvious in my inputs, or math-wise?
Thanks,
Foster
Comment