I just was comparing Mark Teixeira and Carlos Pena and I noticed that Tex has a higher projected OBA and OPS, but a lower projected RC/G. How is that possible? Does RC/G overrate the run value of slugging? Thanks.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Rc/g
Collapse
X
-
If player A has a higher OBP and OPS than player B, Player A's rc/g should always be higher. This is an axiom as far as I know, unless the rc/g formula doesn't take into account AB, walks, hits, HBP, GDP, SB, CS, and total bases.
The exception is when player A has more GDP and CS.John
"You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means!"--Inigo Montoya, "The Princess Bride"
Comment
-
RC formula: (H + BB - CS) x (Total bases + (.55 x SB)) / (AB + BB)
RC/G formula: Runs Created / ((AB - H + CS) / 25.5)
Comment
-
RobR reminded me that we're using the RC/G2 formula on the site, not the one I quoted above:
Runs created per game2 (Neil Bonner)
(SS x 37.96) + (ct% x 10.38) + (bb% x 14.81) – 13.04
where SS, or "swing speed" is defined as
((1B x 0.5) + (2B x 0.8) + (3B x 1.1) + (HR x 1.2)) / (AB - K)
Comment
-
Originally posted by RAY@HQ View PostRobR reminded me that we're using the RC/G2 formula on the site, not the one I quoted above:John
"You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means!"--Inigo Montoya, "The Princess Bride"
Comment
-
Originally posted by Astros34 View PostIs this formula using BPIs or actual stats, or is there a difference in using ct% and bb% rather than actual walks and strikeouts? I don't want RC/G on MACK to be something "predictive" or I can't use it, especially as it seems to be what is used to determine RAR.
Comment
Comment