Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Custom Draft Guide

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Custom Draft Guide

    Since this new format I can't adjust the weights in anything but whole numbers? Lets say, I'm ranking for a 5x5 league. I've always been light in HRs lets say. I've adjusted that weight up to 1.3 or another decimal number. This year it will only use whole numbers. I adjust to 1.3 and run it, it reverts back to 1 for the weight. In other words it rounds up or down. A weight of 1.5 will round up to 2. Sure it lets me adjust to decimals, after I run the settings and go back to settings, it's changed to whole numbers. Is this the new normal?

  • #2
    No, that's on the list to be fixed. Hoping for an update on this today/tomorrow. Stay tuned.

    Comment


    • #3
      Thank You

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by RAY@HQ View Post
        No, that's on the list to be fixed. Hoping for an update on this today/tomorrow. Stay tuned.
        It's been a week today? Still waiting.... My drafts will all be complete next week...............

        Comment


        • #5
          Yes, I brought this up again in my last checkin with the techies. Will do so today as well. You can see in yesterday's site update all of the stuff we have knocked off the list in the last week... just haven't gotten to this one yet.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by ketrink8e View Post
            Since this new format I can't adjust the weights in anything but whole numbers? Lets say, I'm ranking for a 5x5 league. I've always been light in HRs lets say. I've adjusted that weight up to 1.3 or another decimal number. This year it will only use whole numbers. I adjust to 1.3 and run it, it reverts back to 1 for the weight. In other words it rounds up or down. A weight of 1.5 will round up to 2. Sure it lets me adjust to decimals, after I run the settings and go back to settings, it's changed to whole numbers. Is this the new normal?
            This is now done. Both the category weights and the minimum bid fields now support decimals. So you can weight SB at 0.9, as I've done for years, or if you're in a $26/0.10 min bid league instead of $260/1, you can set that up properly too.

            Comment


            • #7
              Valuation method doesn't appear to be working, Balanced and Top players give the same results (to the penny).

              Comment


              • #8
                Hey there,

                I was originally going to ask for a reminder of what the different valuation methods mean exactly (top players, balanced, etc.), as there was an explanation provided in previous years that doesn't seem to be around anymore.

                Having come across this thread, though, and kez's comment above about different valuation methods yielding the same dollar figures, I did my own comparison, and that still appears to be the case. I'd be interested in knowing if that's something that's being looked at.

                Thanks!

                Comment


                • #9
                  Yes, that's still the way it works, and it's still on our list to address.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    We have 8 bench players we get in reserve round that don’t count in budget. We have 8 majors and 3 minors keepers. Do I check the keeper and reserves boxes for the CDG? Thanks!
                    mixed keeper auction 16 teams high stakes $ long running with consistent ownership - *16 teams this year 2019*!
                    5x5 (obp instead of avg) and 24 active players,10 pitchers.
                    8 reserve slots ($3, snake draft). 3 minors slots. 260 budget. 100 faab budget weekly.
                    8 roster keepers - max 3 years @ +$3 1st year kept, +$4 2nd year, +$7 third year.
                    3 Minors keepers +$1/year

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      No, bench players should be 0 unless you pay auction dollars for them.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by RAY@HQ View Post
                        Yes, that's still the way it works, and it's still on our list to address.
                        Thanks, Ray.

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X