When reviewing potential matchups, the Braves Home OPS struck me as ridiculously low (and espn stats - triple slash - have completely different (more in line with expectations):
BBHQ
espn
I understand projections going haywire as sample size goes lower and starting working 2017 stuff in, but I would have thought "stats" would be unaffected. Thanks!
BBHQ
Atlanta Braves | ||||||||||||||||
Avg | OB | SLG | OPS | bb% | ct% | h% | EYE | G | L | F | PX | SX | SBO | xBA | RC/G | |
Away | 250 | 311 | 392 | 702 | 8% | 78% | 30 | 0.39 | 48 | 21 | 31 | 92 | 79 | 6% | 259 | 4.08 |
At Home | 161 | 212 | 226 | 438 | 6% | 81% | 20 | 0.33 | 36 | 20 | 44 | 53 | 26 | 0% | 219 | 1.46 |
NAME | GP | W | L | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BA | OBP | SLG | OPS |
Total | 150 | 59 | 91 | 5156 | 595 | 1311 | 281 | 24 | 109 | 564 | .254 | .320 | .381 | .702 |
Home | 75 | 26 | 49 | 2556 | 303 | 662 | 129 | 13 | 44 | 284 | .259 | .327 | .371 | .698 |
I understand projections going haywire as sample size goes lower and starting working 2017 stuff in, but I would have thought "stats" would be unaffected. Thanks!
Comment