cdg

[tuna411]

- players listed at inaccurate positions based on games played in league set up
- multi-positional players listed at only one position

kind of frustrating as I do the lists...

[RAY@HQ]

Give some examples. I'm happy to look into this, but we've paid a lot of attention to getting that stuff right, and if there were a bunch of errors I'd be hearing about it from a whole bunch of people, and I'm not.

Make sure to set your position eligibility threshold on the input screen. And don't look at the Position field for eligibility, look at the Elig field. That will match your input settings.

Again, if you have examples of errors, share them here and I'll check them out ASAP.

[tuna411]

I hate sounding like a whiner, sorry. the system wasn't like this previously (or I don't recall it being like it currently is).

today I am writing out my second league positional list and using 20 games.

Some examples of what I am referring to:

- I assume a guy like mckinstry - played 20 games at ss.3b.of - would show up in each position when I que for positions. He doesn't, only shows up in ss.
- Acuna, reached 20 games only 2b, shows up only in outfield.
- murakami played 3b in 2025, listed at 1b.
- okamoto played enough to qualify at both 1b and 3b, listed only at 3b.
- There are a bunch of guys who show up only at dh but are eligible elsewhere (springer, alvarez, rooker, stanton, soler, canzone, benintendi, etc etc).
- ernie clement shows up at only 2b but eligible at 2b.ss.3b.
- colt keith, eligible at 2b.3b, only shows at 3b.

There are more examples but it appears mostly the multi positional guys are isolated to a single position in the positional rankings, in addition to assumptions on playing time and a couple of inaccurate positions.

Part of my frustration stems from doing live in person 10 game requirement a couple of days ago and was totally caught off guard by where players were being placed once they were purchased. Huge disadvantage

Maybe I am queing incorrectly? If so, I apologize for the rant...

[RAY@HQ]

I'm not totally sure where you're looking, but in the table output of the CDG, it sounds like you are using the POS field when you should be using the Elig field. The latter has the exact qualified eligibility. POS does not. POS is a single value, so if you're trying to sort by that to generate positional lists, that is not going to accurately reflect eligibility.

if you use the Grid view, that shows each player at every position they are eligible at, unless you check the "primary position only" box at the top.

For newcomers this year like the Asian guys and rookies like McGonigle, we don't have their games played from last year in the system, so those do default to the value in the POS field.

Hope this helps.