Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

CDG Question and QS not working

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Snider
    replied
    I appreciate your help. The CDG was such a valuable tool for me and by not using it I miss it. I’m sure with the new change I’m doing something wrong but I can’t figure it out.

    Leave a comment:


  • RAY@HQ
    replied
    That's it, thanks. Will investigate this weekend.

    Leave a comment:


  • Snider
    replied


    How is this?? Thanks.

    Leave a comment:


  • RAY@HQ
    replied
    That's not the full link that I need. Try grabbing the link from your CDG results page. Should look something like this:

    Leave a comment:


  • Snider
    replied


    Here is the link. Thanks for your help. I don't know what inputs I have wrong. Just to clarify the categories are:

    Hitters - Runs/HR/RBI/SB/OPS
    Pitchers are more complicated - ERA/WHIP/SO/(W+QS)/(SV+HLD)

    Leave a comment:


  • RAY@HQ
    replied
    Originally posted by Snider View Post
    I have struggled since the change to the site with the CDG to the point where I don't use it anymore because I haven't believed the output given the inputs that i have put into the systems for many years - sadly. By the way I used to use the CDG all the time and never questioned the output because the players passed the "smell test". So I went back to it today just to check it out and inputted our factors as I have done many times. Lo and behold the CDG on my device is showing Ivan Herrera as the 2nd most valuable catcher going forward. He ranks higher than every catcher other than William Contreras. I just don't believe that Herrera should rank above Rutschman, or W. Smith, or others.

    His raw stats according to his player link page for the projected balance are:
    AB = 284 at 70% playing time
    Runs = 43
    HR = 7
    RBI = 40
    SB = 7
    AVG = 0.247
    OPS = 0.723

    Does that sound like the Forum catcher going forward?

    Below him is Will Smith
    AB - 337 at 80% PT
    Runs = 53
    HR = 14
    RBI = 60
    SB = 1
    AVG = .261
    OPS = 0.776

    Adley Rutschman
    AB = 382 at 90% PT
    Runs = 55
    HR = 15
    RBI = 54
    SB = 1
    AVG = .267
    OPS 0.775

    In our format stolen bases are just one out of 5 categories with OPS counted instead of BA. Yes Herrera is projected to get 7 SB where the other two only have 1. But the other catchers are much higher than Herrera in every other category. I don't think anyone would think that Ivan Herrera should be ranked as the second best catcher going forward just $1 less than William Contreras and higher than both Will Smith and Adley Rutschman. That just is not credible. Any thoughts on this would be appreciated.
    As always, I need to see your inputs to the CDG. You can send me your full URL to the CDG, I think you've done that before. The base values on the site don't show what you are describing here, so I would like to review your config.

    Leave a comment:


  • bowi8son
    replied
    IT will miraculously have it fixed tomorrow, at least that's what we have been assured

    Leave a comment:


  • Snider
    replied
    I have struggled since the change to the site with the CDG to the point where I don't use it anymore because I haven't believed the output given the inputs that i have put into the systems for many years - sadly. By the way I used to use the CDG all the time and never questioned the output because the players passed the "smell test". So I went back to it today just to check it out and inputted our factors as I have done many times. Lo and behold the CDG on my device is showing Ivan Herrera as the 2nd most valuable catcher going forward. He ranks higher than every catcher other than William Contreras. I just don't believe that Herrera should rank above Rutschman, or W. Smith, or others.

    His raw stats according to his player link page for the projected balance are:
    AB = 284 at 70% playing time
    Runs = 43
    HR = 7
    RBI = 40
    SB = 7
    AVG = 0.247
    OPS = 0.723

    Does that sound like the Forum catcher going forward?

    Below him is Will Smith
    AB - 337 at 80% PT
    Runs = 53
    HR = 14
    RBI = 60
    SB = 1
    AVG = .261
    OPS = 0.776

    Adley Rutschman
    AB = 382 at 90% PT
    Runs = 55
    HR = 15
    RBI = 54
    SB = 1
    AVG = .267
    OPS 0.775

    In our format stolen bases are just one out of 5 categories with OPS counted instead of BA. Yes Herrera is projected to get 7 SB where the other two only have 1. But the other catchers are much higher than Herrera in every other category. I don't think anyone would think that Ivan Herrera should be ranked as the second best catcher going forward just $1 less than William Contreras and higher than both Will Smith and Adley Rutschman. That just is not credible. Any thoughts on this would be appreciated.

    Leave a comment:


  • RAY@HQ
    replied
    Originally posted by RAY@HQ View Post
    1. I actually started to look into this over the weekend. Changes are happening in the projections, but I think they may be happening a bit more slowly than they would have in the past/slower than they should be. In general I WANT the projections to be fairly slow to react to in-season changes, but we might be on the verge of "too slow". Note that this is not specifically a CDG issue, it's in the root of the projections. More to come on this.
    Quoting myself.... we did indeed find and fix a problem relating to how quickly the rest-of-year projections (the "Projected Balance" line in Playerlink) was incorporating the year-to-date stats into the projection. For many/most players, this wasn't really noticeable at all... but over the past couple of weeks, if you looked at outlier performances like, say, Elly DLC's SB total, or Imanaga/Ranger Suarez's hot starts in ERA/WHIP, the projections were being very slow to acknowledge the change in performance.... basically treating them more as if this was late-April rather than late-May.

    We've made that correction today and have re-generated the projections just now. Like I said, in many cases you won't notice a difference. But for those of you who download the projections every day, you'll see a noticeable shuffling of projected values etc. Think of it as us just hitting fast-forward on a couple of weeks worth of the process that normally happens very slowly day-over-day throughout the season.

    Leave a comment:


  • RAY@HQ
    replied
    1. I actually started to look into this over the weekend. Changes are happening in the projections, but I think they may be happening a bit more slowly than they would have in the past/slower than they should be. In general I WANT the projections to be fairly slow to react to in-season changes, but we might be on the verge of "too slow". Note that this is not specifically a CDG issue, it's in the root of the projections. More to come on this.
    2. Have reported this to tech, should be fixed soon.
    3. All PLink tabs are there on the mobile view, but they aren't tabs... it's a dropdown selector, it appears right below the end of the Forecaster comment. You can pick any of the tabs there, including 'Content'.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Brave Bull
    started a topic CDG Question and QS not working

    CDG Question and QS not working

    I'm wondering if I should be trusting the CDG right now, and I haven't noticed this issue in the past. I'm seeing examples that have me thinking that it's not getting updated regularly. Example: Jared Jones has been lights out with top notch skills over the course of like 8 starts yet it's projecting him ROS to have trash numbers and earn -$7. How can that be? And I've seen other anomalies that have me thinking it's going off of pre-season projections.

    Also, on the player profiles it's not accounting for QS, one of my categories. It shows every SP having zero QS.

    Lastly, on my phone if I look up a player it takes me to his page but there's no 'content' button like on the computer where I can read the latest posts where he's mentioned.
Working...
X