Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

CDG - PLAYER VALUATOR - Problem

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • CDG - PLAYER VALUATOR - Problem

    Received this msg beginning Saturday.

    Dollar value: Not enough players for force position
    taken: 13 reqd: 168
    c: 0 / 24 / 0
    ss: 0 / 12 / 0
    sb: 0 / 12 / 0
    of: 0 / 60 / 0
    tb: 0 / 12 / 0
    fb: 0 / 12 / 0
    mi: 0 / 12 / 0
    ci: 0 / 12 / 0
    ut: 13 / 12 / 0.059175511663307
    Games Qualification based on: 7 games.

  • #2
    It's working ok for me, but I saw someone else report this too. I need to see what your input settings are that makes this happen. Post a screenshot if you can.

    Comment


    • #3
      I'm the guy from the other thread. Here's a screenshot of one of my inputs.
      inputs.PNG

      Comment


      • #4
        P.s. I get the same result with fewer qualification games.

        Comment


        • #5
          By the way, this is off-topic, but I may as well mention it: the two utility players are a fudge--it should be one UT and one IF. When our league changed the rosters from 14 hitters / 9 pitchers to 12/11 to better reflect current MLB ratios, we dropped one outfielder and combined MI and CI into a single infielder. Unfortunately, your CDG cannot accommodate that.

          Comment


          • #6
            Interesting. I don't recall ever seeing that before. Might be something we introduced with the positional qualification change, not sure. But I can tell you that it goes away if you turn off the "force positions" checkbox.... which probably doesn't matter much in your format with both the UTIL and IF spots (it likely only affects catchers).

            We'll take a closer look at this for sure.

            Comment


            • #7
              OK - I think we should have this resolved now.
              Could you let me know if it's still happening?

              Comment


              • #8
                Looks better for me! Anyone else?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Looks good here too. Thanks!

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Looks Good! Thanks..

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X