Tweet
Apologies is this is the wrong forum for this post.
FWIW, I posted a similar (and longer) post in the Think Tank section, but was largely ignored until someone another reader suggested using Rotolab.. The other post:
http://www.baseballhq.com/subscribe/...=22523#newpost )
I'm trying to figure out how to come up with values for a hybrid player pool, consisting of the AL plus 6 NL teams (CHI, FLA, HOU, PHI, SD, STL). Trying to merge a list consisting of AL-only values and adding in the desired NL-only values is skewed since the values are base on mutually exclusive player pools. Using a complete AL/NL list and weeding out the unneeded teams doesn't take into account the stats being removed.. Is there a better way to figure the values out?
Suggestion for HQ - In the future, in addition to being able to stipulate AL- or NL-only and AL+NL in the custom valuator, might it be possible to be able to pick and choose which individual MLB teams are involved in the player pool?
FWIW, I posted a similar (and longer) post in the Think Tank section, but was largely ignored until someone another reader suggested using Rotolab.. The other post:
http://www.baseballhq.com/subscribe/...=22523#newpost )
I'm trying to figure out how to come up with values for a hybrid player pool, consisting of the AL plus 6 NL teams (CHI, FLA, HOU, PHI, SD, STL). Trying to merge a list consisting of AL-only values and adding in the desired NL-only values is skewed since the values are base on mutually exclusive player pools. Using a complete AL/NL list and weeding out the unneeded teams doesn't take into account the stats being removed.. Is there a better way to figure the values out?
Suggestion for HQ - In the future, in addition to being able to stipulate AL- or NL-only and AL+NL in the custom valuator, might it be possible to be able to pick and choose which individual MLB teams are involved in the player pool?